Y10W13WR · Writing · Year 10

Should the ATAR Be Abolished as the Main Pathway?

WEEK 13 OF 44

Part 1

How to Write

Persuasive – Submission

A persuasive submission argues for a clear position on an issue and aims to influence a specific decision-maker. It is written for a formal audience — often a committee, council or leadership group — and must be credible and well-reasoned. The tone should be confident and respectful, demonstrating careful thinking about the issue.

Common pitfalls: Arguing from passion alone without evidence or reasoning — a good submission shows logical thinking, not just strong feeling. Failing to acknowledge the other side even briefly, which makes your argument look one-sided.

Part 2

Your Task Plan for Today

The brief

Question: Write a submission to the national education review arguing for or against abolishing the ATAR as the primary pathway for university entry. Take a clear position, support it with reasoning and address at least one argument on the other side. Your submission will be tabled as part of the review’s public consultation findings.

Stimulus: A national education review is examining whether the ATAR should remain the primary pathway for university entry in Australia. The ATAR is a ranked score comparing students’ academic performance against their peers. Critics argue that it rewards a narrow range of academic skills, produces damaging levels of stress and disadvantages students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Defenders argue that it is transparent, consistent across schools and provides universities with a reliable comparative measure. The review has invited written submissions from students, educators and members of the public.

Task Analysis: This task asks you to make a compelling case for a position you genuinely hold. You must build a logical argument while showing you understand and respect counterarguments. A strong response demonstrates both conviction and intellectual honesty about what is genuinely complicated.

Quick Plan

Before you write, plan:

  • Your position — what exactly do you believe and why?
  • Why it matters — what real problem are you addressing? What’s at stake?
  • Your strongest arguments — what evidence, logic or reasoning best supports you?
  • The strongest counterargument — what’s the best case against your position?
  • Your rebuttal — why are you still convinced you’re right despite those concerns?

Thesis/position

State your position clearly and directly. Don’t hedge or apologise for what you believe. Make it clear what you want your reader to think, believe or do.

Evidence chain

Build your case point by point. Each argument should strengthen and build on the previous one. Use real evidence—examples, data, reasoning—not just assertion or opinion.

Counterargument

Acknowledge the strongest objection to your position. Show you understand what the other side values and worries about. This deepens your credibility.

Rebuttal

Explain why your position, despite those real concerns, is more compelling. Show maturity in recognising trade-offs rather than pretending objections don’t exist.

Modality control

Use precise language about certainty. ‘Research suggests…‘ is stronger than ‘obviously…‘ because it’s honest about what we actually know. Qualified claims are more credible.

Call to action

End with clarity about what you want. Not abstract agreement but specific change: ‘therefore, schools should…‘ or ‘this means we need to…‘

Now apply

The writing form will open in a new tab — keep this page open so you can refer back to the brief and your planning as you write.

Open the writing form →