Y06W25WR Should Financial Literacy Be a School Subject?
Part 1
How to Write
A persuasive submission argues for a clear position on an issue and aims to influence a specific decision-maker. It is written for a formal audience — often a committee, council or leadership group — and must be credible and well-reasoned. The tone should be confident and respectful, demonstrating careful thinking about the issue.
- Ideas & content: Take a clear position and develop it with logical, well-supported reasons. Acknowledge complexity where it exists, but always return to your core argument.
- Structure & cohesion: Open with your position, develop your reasons in a logical order and close with a clear recommendation. Use connecting language to move from point to point smoothly.
- Voice & audience: Write for your specific audience — formal, measured and credible. Avoid emotional exaggeration. Show you understand the issue from multiple sides, even while arguing one position.
- Language choices: Use precise, formal vocabulary. Control modality carefully — words like should, must and strongly recommends signal conviction. Vary sentence structure for impact.
- Conventions: Spell key terms correctly. Use punctuation to manage complex sentences. Check that your sentences are as clear as they are persuasive.
Common pitfalls: Arguing from passion alone without evidence or reasoning — a good submission shows logical thinking, not just strong feeling. Failing to acknowledge the other side even briefly, which makes your argument look one-sided.
Part 2
Your Task Plan for Today
Question: Write your response to the education review. Argue clearly either for or against making financial literacy a dedicated subject in Australian schools. Give reasons that would persuade a reviewer thinking about what students genuinely need from their education.
Stimulus: A national education review is considering whether financial literacy - including topics such as budgeting, saving, understanding debt and making financial decisions - should be taught as a dedicated subject in Australian schools. Supporters argue students are not being adequately prepared for real-world financial decisions. Critics argue schools already have too much on their curriculum and that financial education belongs at home. The review has invited responses from students.
Task Analysis: This task asks you to write a submission based on the prompt. Your response should demonstrate clear thinking, good organisation and writing appropriate for a Year 6 reader. Focus on showing your understanding through specific examples and thoughtful details.
Quick Plan
Before you write, plan:
- Your position — what exactly are you arguing for?
- Two or three reasons why this makes sense or matters
- One objection someone might raise and how you’d answer it
- Your call to action — what do you want readers to do?
Thesis or position
State clearly what you’re arguing for, early in your writing. The reader should know exactly where you stand. Be specific, not vague about what you believe.
Evidence chain
Build your case with reasons and examples that connect logically. Each reason should flow into the next, creating a chain of thinking that makes sense.
Counterargument
Acknowledge what someone who disagrees might say. Then show why your position is stronger. This makes your argument more convincing.
Call to action
End with a clear statement of what you want the reader to do or believe. Make it specific and direct. Leave them with something to act on.
- Choosing a selection results in a full page refresh.
- Opens in a new window.