Y09W11VC Word Roots — -crit/-cris- (judge/decide)

The root -crit- / -cris- comes from Greek and carries the core meaning of 'to judge' or 'to decide'. It appears in words related to evaluation, crisis, turning points and critical thinking. Understanding this root helps students recognise an important cluster of terms used across literary analysis, medical writing and academic argument. This module explores six Academic Vocab words alongside three further examples in the Word Families section.

Word Families

These three word-family examples show how -crit/-cris- carries the idea of 'judge/decide' into more complex words. Notice how the shared root can help you unlock meaning and use each word more accurately in academic writing.

criterion

/kraɪˈtɪəriən/

cri‑te‑ri‑on

noun

A standard, rule or principle used to judge or evaluate something. The plural form is criteria.

Word Breakdown: -crit- (root meaning 'to judge' or 'to decide') + -ion (suffix forming a noun from a root or verb)

Example: The most important criterion for a strong argument is that every claim must be supported by relevant evidence.

Synonyms: standard, measure, benchmark

Collocations: key criterion, assessment criterion, meet a criterion

critical

/ˈkrɪtɪkəl/

crit‑i‑cal

adjective

Involving careful analysis and evaluation; also means of crucial importance, or pointing out faults.

Word Breakdown: -crit- (root meaning 'to judge') + -ical (suffix meaning 'relating to' or 'characterised by')

Example: A critical reading of the text requires the reader to question the assumptions embedded in the author's language choices.

Synonyms: analytical, evaluative, essential

Collocations: critical thinking, critical analysis, critical perspective

discern

/dɪˈsɜːn/

dis‑cern

verb | [discern – discerned – discerned]

To recognise or perceive something clearly, especially something that is not obvious or is difficult to detect.

Word Breakdown: dis- (prefix meaning 'apart') + -cern (variant of -cris-, from Latin cernere, meaning 'to separate' or 'to distinguish')

Example: A skilled reader can discern the author's ideological position even when it is never explicitly stated.

Synonyms: detect, perceive, recognise

Collocations: discern a pattern, discern the difference, discern meaning

Academic Vocab

interrogate

/ɪnˈtɛrəɡeɪt/

in‑ter‑ro‑gate

verb | [interrogate – interrogated – interrogated]

To question something closely and critically, examining it in depth to uncover assumptions, flaws or deeper meanings.

Word Breakdown: inter- (prefix meaning 'between' or 'among')

Word family: interrogation (n.), interrogative (adj.)

Example: A strong analytical essay interrogates the assumptions underlying both the primary source and the critical literature.

Synonyms: question, examine, probe

Collocations: interrogate the text, interrogate assumptions, interrogate the evidence

critique

/krɪˈtiːk/

cri‑tique

verb | [critique – critiqued – critiqued]

To assess and evaluate something in a detailed and analytical way, identifying both strengths and weaknesses.

Word family: critique (n.), critical (adj.)

Example: Students were asked to critique the methodology of the study, noting any gaps in the research design.

Synonyms: analyse, evaluate, assess

Collocations: critique the argument, critique a text, offer a critique

deconstruct

/ˌdiːkənˈstrʌkt/

de‑con‑struct

verb | [deconstruct – deconstructed – deconstructed]

To break something down into its component parts in order to examine it critically; to challenge the assumptions underlying a text or idea.

Word family: deconstruction (n.), deconstructive (adj.)

Example: The essay deconstructs the romantic idealism of the poem, revealing the power dynamics that underpin it.

Synonyms: break down, analyse, dismantle

Collocations: deconstruct the text, deconstruct an argument, deconstruct assumptions

problematise

/prɒˈblɛmətaɪz/

prob‑lem‑a‑tise

verb | [problematise – problematised – problematised]

To treat something as a problem worthy of examination; to raise questions about something that is usually taken for granted.

Word family: problematic (adj.)

Example: The theorist's central aim was to problematise the assumption that economic growth automatically improves social wellbeing.

Synonyms: challenge, question, complicate

Collocations: problematise the idea, problematise assumptions, productively problematise

scrutinise

/ˈskruːtɪnaɪz/

scru‑ti‑nise

verb | [scrutinise – scrutinised – scrutinised]

To examine something very carefully and thoroughly, especially to find errors, inconsistencies or hidden meanings.

Word family: scrutiny (n.), scrutinising (adj.)

Example: The independent committee was established to scrutinise the government's claims about the success of the programme.

Synonyms: examine, inspect, investigate

Collocations: scrutinise the data, face scrutiny, under scrutiny

this demonstrates

/ðɪs ˈdɛmənstreɪts/

this dem‑on‑strates

phrase

Used in academic writing to signal that the evidence or reasoning just presented provides clear proof of a point.

Example: The unemployment figures remained unchanged for three consecutive quarters; this demonstrates that the economic recovery has stalled.

Synonyms: this proves, this shows, this confirms

Collocations: this demonstrates that, this demonstrates how, this clearly demonstrates

Confusing Words

premise vs conclusion

These two terms are foundational to logical argument and are sometimes confused because they both play essential roles in the same argument structure.

  • premise — premise an underlying assumption or starting point on which an argument is built — what the argument takes for granted; for example, ‘The entire argument rests on the premise that all students have equal access to technology at home.’
  • conclusion — conclusion the final claim or position that an argument arrives at, based on the reasoning and evidence that has been presented; for example, ‘After reviewing all the data, the researchers reached the conclusion that longer school days did not improve academic outcomes.’

Memory rule: In a well-constructed argument, the premises come first and lead logically to the conclusion. A useful check: if you removed the premises, could you still reach the conclusion? If not, the argument is sound. If yes, the conclusion may not actually follow from the evidence provided.