Y08W18GR Nominalisation (core)
Nominalisation (core)
Some writing sounds more formal because it turns actions and qualities into things that can be discussed. This use of nominalisation helps English sound more academic and compact, but it works best when the meaning stays clear.
- how nominalisation changes verbs or adjectives into nouns
- how nominalisation can create a more formal, condensed style
- how to avoid vague writing when using abstract nouns
- Nominalisation turns actions or qualities into nouns, such as decide becoming decision or important becoming importance.
- Academic tone often grows stronger when ideas are presented as concepts rather than simple actions.
- Condensation happens when more meaning is packed into fewer words or into tighter noun groups.
- Clarity still matters, because too many abstract nouns can make writing sound distant or confusing.
- Balance is important, so nominalisation should support meaning rather than hide it.
How it works
In Year 7 you learnt how nominalisation turns verbs and adjectives into nouns to create analytical density. This module builds on that — you will now apply nominalisation as a core tool of formal academic writing, and learn when it strengthens your writing and when it weakens it.
1Turn actions into nouns
A common pattern in formal writing is changing a verb into a noun. This lets the action become the topic of the sentence.
- Verb to noun helps the sentence sound more analytical. For example, Students discussed the rule can become The discussion of the rule continued.
- Topic shift happens because the noun can now carry the main idea of the sentence.
- Formal effect often appears when the writing focuses on the concept, not just the people doing it.
2Use nominalisation to condense ideas
Nominalisation can make writing tighter by grouping information more efficiently. This is useful when you want the sentence to sound organised and academic.
- Condensed meaning can reduce repetition. For example, The school decided to change the timetable can become The school’s decision to change the timetable.
- Noun groups can carry more detail in a smaller space, especially in explanation and argument.
- Careful control matters because a shorter sentence is not always a clearer one.
3Build a more formal tone
Formal writing often sounds less personal and more focused on ideas. Nominalisation helps shift the tone in that direction.
- Abstract focus lets the writing discuss ideas such as improvement, response or evaluation rather than only actions.
- Less personal style can make the writing sound more objective. For example, We analysed the results may become The analysis of the results showed…
- Purpose match is important because this style suits explanation and argument more than casual storytelling.
4Watch for vagueness
Nominalisation becomes weak when the nouns are too abstract or too disconnected from real meaning. A formal tone should not become foggy.
- Vague nouns such as thing, issue, factor can blur the idea instead of sharpening it.
- Missing actor can cause confusion when the writing no longer shows who did something or what caused it.
- Clear support helps the noun stay meaningful. For example, the improvement in attendance is clearer than the improvement of the situation.
5Keep balance in the sentence
Strong writing mixes nominalisation with clear verbs. This balance helps the sentence sound mature without becoming heavy.
- Active clarity still matters because readers need movement as well as concepts.
- Too much abstraction can slow the sentence down and make it harder to picture.
- Best use often comes when one important nominalisation is supported by a clear verb. For example, The decision improved student focus is more direct than The decision resulted in an improvement in student focus.
6Recognising over-nominalisation in academic writing
Nominalisation is powerful, but using too many abstract nouns in a row creates writing that is dense, impersonal, and difficult to read. Here are three examples from academic contexts where excessive nominalisation weakens the writing — and how to fix each one.
- Example 1 — Action buried in abstractions
- Over-nominalised: The implementation of the standardisation of assessment procedures across all departments resulted in the improvement of the consistency of outcomes.
- Revised: When assessment procedures were standardised across all departments, outcomes became more consistent.
- Problem: Four consecutive abstract nouns (implementation, standardisation, improvement, consistency) make the sentence slow and unnatural. Restoring verbs reveals the cause and effect more clearly.
- Example 2 — Unclear responsibility
- Over-nominalised: The development of an understanding of the relationship between poverty and educational disadvantage requires the acknowledgement of the contribution of systemic inequality.
- Revised: Understanding how poverty creates educational disadvantage requires us to acknowledge the role of systemic inequality.
- Problem: Chains of nominalisation (development of an understanding, contribution of systemic inequality) obscure who is doing what. Restoring verbs and actors clarifies the meaning considerably.
- Example 3 — Loss of verb energy
- Over-nominalised: There was a demonstration of improvement in the performance of students following the implementation of the programme.
- Revised: Students performed better after the programme was implemented.
- Problem: Seven words of abstraction replace a single clear verb. The revised version is sharper and more direct without losing any precision.
See it in action
Making the tone more formal
The students reacted quickly to the new rule.
The students’ reaction to the new rule was immediate.
The revised version sounds more formal because the action becomes a noun.
Condensing an idea
The school decided to extend lunchtime, and this changed the daily routine.
The school’s decision to extend lunchtime changed the daily routine.
This is stronger because the nominalisation helps combine the ideas more tightly.
Avoiding vague abstraction
The situation led to an improvement in things.
The change led to an improvement in student participation.
The second version is clearer because the noun is linked to a specific outcome.
Keeping balance
The implementation of the rule resulted in the improvement of behaviour.
The rule improved behaviour after its implementation.
The improved sentence keeps one useful nominalisation but restores a clear verb.
- Nominalisation changes actions or qualities into nouns.
- It can create a more formal and condensed style.
- It works well when the noun still has a clear meaning.
- Too much abstraction can make writing vague.
- Strong sentences usually balance nominal nouns with active verbs.
- nominalisation(noun) the process of turning a verb or adjective into a noun, often to create a more formal style
- abstract noun(noun) a noun naming an idea, quality or process rather than a physical object, such as decision or importance
- condensation(noun) the packing of more meaning into fewer words or tighter structures
- clarity(noun) the quality of being easy to understand, especially when formal language still stays specific
- Choosing a selection results in a full page refresh.
- Opens in a new window.