Language Choices
Precise words over vague ones like 'good' or 'bad.'
Verbs like 'reveals,' 'suggests,' 'shows,' 'protects,' 'limits.'
Claims about cause, effect or hidden patterns.
Language that captures exactly what each approach does.
-
Precision: exact language that makes specific claims about what the approaches reveal.
Task in one sentence
Write a comparative piece examining what Marcus and Lily each protect themselves from, what it costs them, and what real skill would need.
Let’s Focus
Two strands matter most this week: Language Choices and Conventions. Use precise language to show what each approach does — Marcus 'narrows options,' Lily 'follows curiosity.' Keep conventions tight so nothing pulls the reader out of your analysis.
Language Choices
Analytical language about creative work should be precise. Instead of calling Marcus 'careful' and Lily 'creative,' use specific language: Marcus 'narrows options'; Lily 'follows curiosity.' Use verbs that show cause and effect — Marcus's approach 'protects him from failure'; Lily's 'enables discovery.'
What markers scan for
- Replace vague words like 'good' or 'careful' with specific ones.
- Pick verbs that show cause and effect.
- Describe what each approach does — not just what it is.
- Let language reveal benefit and cost.
Score Bands
-
Basic
Uses vague language; lacks specific detail; verbs don't clearly show cause and effect.
-
Strong
Uses precise language that captures what each approach does; verbs suggest cause and effect.
-
Excellent
Language is carefully calibrated to reveal what each approach suggests about how the student understands creativity.
Conventions
In analytical writing, conventions serve clarity. Sentence variety helps you emphasise: a short sentence highlights an insight; a longer one develops a complex idea. Paragraphing should group related observations. Use clear pronouns and consistent names so readers always know whether you mean Marcus or Lily.
What markers scan for
- Vary sentence length to emphasise key points.
- Group related observations into clear paragraphs.
- Keep spelling and punctuation accurate throughout.
- Make every pronoun's reference clear.
Score Bands
-
Basic
Conventions are loose; sentences feel similar; errors distract; pronouns sometimes unclear.
-
Strong
Conventions are accurate and support clarity; sentence variety emphasises key points; paragraphing is logical.
-
Excellent
Conventions are flawless and serve the analysis; sentence structure emphasises insights; paragraphing creates logical movement.
Student sample for assessment
Written by a Year 7 student in Elsternwick, VIC, Australia.
Marcus and Lily represent two opposite strategies for managing uncertainty in creative work, and examining what each approach costs reveals something important about what genuine creativity requires. Marcus feels uncomfortable until he narrows his options to something safe-a goal he can clearly identify and meet. This protects him from failure and from the discomfort of not knowing what he is creating. But it also prevents discovery. When Marcus writes, he is not exploring; he is finding the right answer to a question already asked. His competence comes at a cost: he never experiences the productive uncertainty that leads to original thinking. Lily works differently. She starts before she knows where she is going, which means she tolerates not knowing. She crosses things out, abandons directions, and sometimes produces uneven work-a striking passage followed by something underdeveloped. But notice what her tolerance for uncertainty allows: discovery. When she revises, she is not fixing mistakes; she is following ideas as they emerge. Her willingness to say 'I don't know where this is going yet' creates space for something genuinely new to appear. The cost is inconsistency; the benefit is that her best work shows genuine thinking, not just competent execution. What emerges from this comparison is that genuine creativity requires both the confidence to explore without a predetermined answer and the discipline to shape what emerges into something coherent. Neither Marcus nor Lily has achieved this balance. Marcus has discipline without exploration; Lily has exploration without consistency. A genuinely skilled creative practitioner would know when to narrow and when to wander-when to hold a goal firmly and when to let it change. This balance is what separates competence from genuine creativity.
